Bitcoin Shrugs Off Midterms as Experts Say Democratic Sweep Was 'Priced In'

By Ryan S. Gladwin

Democrats flipped both the House of Representatives and the Senate in the U.S. midterms, handing President Donald Trump a major political setback.

Experts say this was not the "preferred outcome" for crypto markets and that it has increased "uncertainty" for future pro-crypto policy. However, after a brief dip, Bitcoin is up 1.6% over the past 24 hours and now sits at $78,277, per Decrypt data. Broadly, almost every top 100 crypto token by market cap is in the green for the day.

"I think the Democratic sweep was largely priced in going into the midterms," André Dragosch, head of research at Bitwise Europe, told Decrypt. "The downside risks were fairly limited going into these midterms as sentiment was already very bearish and there were already signs of seller exhaustion again. So, it is no surprise that we have seen this kind of V-shaped recovery on an intraday basis during the midterms."

Polymarket put odds of the Democratic Party sweeping both the House and Senate during the midterms at 65.5% at the start of the week. Dragosch said these odds meant that markets weren't shocked by Tuesday's results.

James Butterfill, head of research at CoinShares, agreed. "My sense is that Bitcoin had largely priced in a Democratic sweep, leaving room for a relief rally as uncertainty clears," he said in comments shared with Decrypt. "Therefore, the anticipated result need not trigger another sell-off."

"Crypto policy did not decide the midterms. The economy, gas prices, the Iran situation, and Trump's unmet promises did," Heslin Kim, co-founder and CBO of Zenith, told Decrypt. "Crypto policy was irrelevant to the broader voting pool, but it now has the baggage of all the egregious activity that was stirred up in our ecosystem associated with the Trump family."

Tim Sun, senior analyst at HashKey, told Decrypt that the results do "increase the uncertainty surrounding the progress of crypto policy," but that Bitcoin's price action means that the market doesn't interpret it as a "major negative catalyst."

Specifically, this may be because the midterm results don't mean the Democrats can roll back existing pro-crypto guidelines set out by the SEC and CFTC, Dragosch said. However, it does mean that going forward, the market cannot rely as heavily on Trump's "political tailwinds for momentum," Sun added.

It also complicates the picture for the Clarity Act, which would establish rules for crypto markets. The bill has been in limbo since it was introduced in 2025, with many Democrats opposing it due to Trump's crypto conflicts of interest.

Dmitry Machikhin, CEO of BitOK, predicted in a note shared with Decrypt that the Clarity Act will remain in limbo well into 2027, thanks to the midterm results.

"The greater concern is slower crypto reform," Butterfill said. "CLARITY faces a harder path, while investigations into Trump-linked ventures could consume political capital and generate uncomfortable headlines across the sector. But the administration remains in place, and existing regulatory progress, including GENIUS, does not simply disappear."

He expects U.S. exchanges, token issuers and businesses that rely on new regulatory permissions to be more sensitive to the result than Bitcoin, and said established, compliant operators could even gain if scrutiny falls disproportionately on weaker competitors.

"A Democratic Congress may even be good for the industry in one way," Marcin Kaźmierczak, co-founder and COO of RedStone, told Decrypt. "Crypto shouldn't depend on one political camp. Infrastructure has to work for whoever is in power and bring most value to the ecosystem participants. Finance is changing, and politics will not stop it."

Despite the switch-up in the House and Senate, Dragosch expects little to change over the next two years.

"I personally expect more disputes, disagreements, and simply more of 'nothing stops this train,'" he said, pointing to a lack of significant progress to rein in fiscal deficits. "We will probably remain in a fiscally dominant environment with increasing fiscal risks, which I think is ultimately a tailwind for hard assets like Bitcoin."

Instead, he believes macro factors "remain in the driver's seat for now." Specifically, he points to a potential upcoming pivot from the Federal Reserve as a response to "increasing risk" around the AI trade.

"This will likely cause renewed interest in debasement-resistant assets like Bitcoin," Dragosch said, "and will continue to drive institutional adoption via ETPs and treasury companies as well."

Butterfill also pointed to macro factors. "For Bitcoin, real yields, dollar liquidity and ETP flows still carry more weight than the elections," he said. "I would temper expectations for the pace of U.S. reform, while remaining constructive on institutional adoption. How Trump responds to being constrained is the less predictable part."

Recommended News