Stablecoins Gain Ground in Blockchain Gaming as Studios Tighten Spending, Study Finds

Stablecoins are emerging as the backbone of blockchain gaming economies, with new industry research finding developers increasingly relying on fiat-pegged tokens to handle payouts, rewards, and cross-game transactions as they move away from speculative design models.

Stablecoins processed an estimated $27.6 trillion in transfer volume in 2024, a scale that the Blockchain Game Alliance’s 2025 report highlighted now exceeds the combined volumes of Visa and Mastercard.

More broadly, they account for about 30% of all crypto transactions, with USDT and USDC accounting for more than 90% of the fiat-backed supply, per the report.

The report also found that confidence within the sector, which collapsed in 2024 as the broader crypto market contracted, has begun to recover in what it called a “corrective phase,” with 65.8% of respondents expressing optimism heading into 2026.

The shift comes as blockchain gaming studios confront a cooling market and look to rebuild around predictable settlement rails and more disciplined, revenue-driven operations.

Stablecoins “simplify the player payment experience by enabling fast, low-fee, borderless transactions without exposure to volatility,” the report reads, adding that these are becoming a practical foundation for everyday in-game purchases and programmable economies.

Barriers remain, however.

One such factor is “end-to-end UX fragmentation,” Matt Aaron, co-founder of multichain wallet tracking and analytics platform Cielo, told Decrypt.

“Even if stablecoins settle quickly, players still face friction when acquiring, storing, sending, or off-ramping them,” he said. “This becomes even harder across multiple chains like Solana and Base, since the same stablecoin lives in different environments and often requires bridging or extra steps.”

Game developers would need to improve abstraction for those on-chain flows, Aaron added.

“Until that full workflow becomes invisible to the user, stablecoins cannot function as a universal settlement layer across game titles,” he said.

Capital scarcity and shifting rules

The blockchain gaming industry is also moving away from its speculative roots and into a more disciplined phase, the report claims. That’s being mirrored by how studios are responding to shifting market conditions.

Capital scarcity has forced game developers “to prioritize product quality, genuine player demand, defensible revenue models, and operational discipline over short-term financial engineering,” the report reads.

That transition is primarily driven by regulatory developments in the U.S., where policy debates and early signals have prompted other jurisdictions, including those in Asia, to formalize their own stablecoin frameworks.

The report cites Singapore, which in November introduced a formal regime for single-currency stablecoins, imposing capital and redemption rules while running interoperability trials with local banks.

In Japan, the Financial Services Agency has prepared rules that would require crypto exchanges to hold dedicated liability reserves for losses from hacks, scrap the existing cold‑wallet exemption, and align treatment more closely with that of traditional securities firms.

Japan has also maintained a stablecoin framework that restricts yen‑denominated issuance to fully backed instruments offered by licensed banks and other regulated intermediaries, where major lenders are already piloting their own models.

Hong Kong, meanwhile, has created a licensing system for fiat-referenced issuers that sets standards for reserves, security controls, and redemption guarantees.

Further West, the UAE has issued payment token regulations through its central bank, as it pilots cross-border settlement systems and government payment experiments. This week, it granted major licenses to Circle, Tether, and Binance.